Giving housewives a bad name
by Grainne
Patricia Quinn seems to have been a busier housewife than most. In addition to her housewifely duties, she had an inordinate amount of paperwork to do. Specifically signing her name to papers she claims to have had no idea about.
Mrs. Quinn, wife of bankrupt businessman Sean Quinn, would have us believe, or rather wanted the Commercial Court to believe, that she didn’t realise she was signing her name to loan documents for millions of euro from the former Anglo Irish Bank. Taking the “ignorance is bliss” stance to a whole new level there. 
Mrs. Quinn’s barrister, Bill Shipsey’s contention, that she was a housewife with no business sophistication was, not just insulting to every housewife in the land, but plainly ridiculous when you consider the sheer amount of companies she was director of (63 Quinn group companies in this country and 28 in the UK) and secretary of 10 or so more.
For her part, she would have us believe that in while signing so many bank loan applications she was in danger of getting RSI, all she had responsibility for was the weekly grocery shop and looking after the household expenses. Mind you I suppose that would have put a lot on her plate, considering the €3m loan the bank was trying to recoup was supposedly for improvements carried out to their family home. That’d give you plenty to think about alright; how much of it to spend on interior decor, soft furnishings and what kind to render the abode ever more palatial?
Mr. Justice Peter Kelly who presided over the case, didn’t need the wisdom of Solomon to know not to swallow the fairy tale he was being fed. He said in summing up, that even a glance at the documents she signed would have shown “all but an illiterate person that it was some form of borrowing from the bank.” He also said she was advancing the “startling proposition” she was a “cat’s paw” for her husband with no clue about documents she was signing and clueless too about being a director and company secretary of so many companies. Cat’s paw? Tail that wagged the dog more like.
Mrs. Quinn did admit that her supposed ignorance of her business dealings was “embarrassing”. She could have added “enraging” too, given that her husband lost more than €3bn on a calamitous gamble on the same bank’s share price. Maybe, if she’d been more clued in, instead of being “clueless” as she’s been described, she could have saved him that folly.
Now the money must be repaid by the wife of the man who was once the richest man in Ireland. Deciding the weekly groceries and the household expenses is going to get a whole lot easier for her from now on.









